Bears @ Vikings, MNF!

On the surface, this game looks like it should be an easy win for the Bears…we handled them pretty easily in the first game, the discrepancy in the win-loss records…but I gotta be honest—THIS GAME SCARES THE CRAP OUT OF ME. Maybe its the fact that its a division game; maybe its the fact that its going to be an away game; maybe its the way we forgot to show up last weekend versus the Patriots. Here are a couple things I will be paying attention to leading up and going into the game next Monday:
1) Where are we going to play? It definitely is not going to be the Metrodome. Early word had the game being moved to the University of Minnesota’s stadium; but the NFL has not given a thumbs up yet; due to the fact that they haven’t been able to clean the same 17-inches of snow off of this field that collapsed the Metrodome, and the lack of heating elements in the field itself at the college stadium. The NFL has acknowledged that the site of Monday night’s game remains a ‘fluid situation.’  Lambeau field has been rumored; The Colts’ field has been offered up. I think either of those might turn this game into a psuedo-home game for the Bears; regardless, it is tough to say how the not knowing will affect both teams.

2) Who will start at QB for the Vikings? Last weekend, Brett Favre missed his 1st game since 1943. Then, Tavaris Jackson left the game with turf toe. The third string QB, Joe Webb, has a hamstring issue. The Vikings signed Patrick Ramsey as insurance incase all three cannot go on Monday night. None of these four will ever be compared at this stage of their respective careers for Tom Brady.

3) Other Viking injuries of note are DE Ray Edwards and CB Chris Cook (Placed on IR). The Edwards thing could be a huge bonus, because JMarcus Webb has struggled recently. He made Jermaine Cunningham look like LT. He has made evey DE in the league so far look like LT.

4) Which run defense will show up? The one from the Giants and Patriots losses? Or the one from the rest of the season? With the uncertainty at the Viking QB spot, you have a feeling Adrian Peterson will get 25-30 carries. And he has hurt the Bears before.

5) Can our offensive line revert to pro-Pats game form? We seemed to take a step back in the last game, after a great deal of consistent improvement the prior 5 weeks. Maybe it had a little to do with the fact that we were losing by 30 points in the second quarter; but it bears watching in a game where you’re facing 2 stud DTs (Pat and Kevin Williams) and Jared Allen. The Vikes are super-thin in the secondary, so if we can give Cutler time, we should be able to exploit that.

6) Can we eliminate the deep ball? Lets assume that Favre or Jackson plays. And Harvin and Rice are on the outside. Can Whatever combination of safeties we use NOT get beat deep?  Harris looked old and slow; Wright made some poor decisions.

7) What is up with our Kick and Punt Coverage teams? Hester and Manning have been superb as usual on our returns. With all the injuries to the Vikings secondary, there will no doubt be some guys who should be bagging groceries covering kicks for the Vikings; so on Monday night, I fully expect Devin Hester to break the returns record (that he has actually already broken, if you count th e Supe Bowl return, and the 108-yard FG return versus the Giants in 2006).  But I cannot remember the last time WE gave up so many big returns. We can’t afford that with Harvin back there.

I am cautiously optimistic that this team has too much pride to follow up the terrible performance at home versus the Pats with a second bad game. Maybe this is what this team needed to get back their edge going into the last four games.

My prediction:  Devin Hester runs a punt back for a TD that breaks this game open early in the fourth quarter. Bears win, 28-13.

UPDATE: Tarvaris Jackson has been placed on IR, so expect Brett Favre to give it a go; but if he can’t, it will be Joe Webb.

9 responses

  1. johnnyharvard

    I know that, but nuetral sites are an option. The field could get a playoff bound team hurt. Not fair to the Bears.

    December 20, 2010 at 4:06 pm

  2. Lincoln1

    The reason the game is staying in Minnesota is because its not fair to the rest of the teams that R fighting for playoff spots against the bears for the bears to be given another home game. If the game is in det, or indy then it becomes a home game for the bears and the league doesnt want that….there is no other issue that exists

    December 19, 2010 at 11:18 pm

  3. johnnyharvard

    Its all about this dumb ass 50th anniversary thing and in consideration for the Viking fans. I will be pissed if some of our key guys go down because of having to play on a frozen field. This is dumb and stupid. Lambeau will sell out too, but they don’t have the facilities to house two sets of outside fan bases. I think thats the issue there. Small amount of hotels. This is just fucked! They should’ve picked a spot right off the bat so arrangements could’ve been made by whoever had to make them.

    December 16, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    • I wonder how much of this is being affected by the potential lockout and the power struggle between the players and owners and the NFL. I forget which Bear it was—how can you fine a player $75,000 for a hit to the head, but then force the players to pay on a field that will be as hard as concrete?

      December 17, 2010 at 5:19 pm

      • johnnyharvard

        It was Tillman, but they’re all pretty much gripping about it. The talk here in Chicago is turning to this becoming a self fulfilling prophecy. Talking about the field and what might happen, because of it instead of being focused on what could very well become the division clincher. When you start to look at this the Vikings are still a very dangerous team when interested. They do have some big time playmakers, so Bears better be focused.

        December 17, 2010 at 8:38 pm

  4. johnnyharvard

    Well its looking less likely its going to be TCF. A decision has to be made soon. I even heard Atlanta and now even Dallas as possible site because they’re weighing the possibilities of where the biggest revenue can be generated. They also have over 16,000 seats short for tickets sold in this game. The one thing that favors the Viking ownership is now they will have a good case for a new stadium and even a move to LA. Losing two home games is a huge loss!

    December 16, 2010 at 9:14 am

    • If they were really just worried about revenue, I dont get why they wouldnt let us play it in Soldier Field or St Louis. You KNOW it would sell out in about 10 minutes.

      December 16, 2010 at 11:15 am

  5. johnnyharvard

    LOL! I sense the Patriot game has shaken your confidence. Well I think this should be a convincing win myself. I’d stack the box and force the QB (whoever that may be) to beat you. On offense I fully expect the Bears to bounce back from last Sunday. I think this game especially favors the Bears if its in lucas oil stadium. Lambeau actually would be the better site for Minnesota as you know the Packer fans will be in that stadium cheering the Vikes hard to keep the Packs dimming playoff hopes alive.

    December 15, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    • Agreed about the Lambeau thing. Although it looks like the Vikes are steadfastly pushing for TCF Stadium, so they can have their 50th Anniversary Celebration. The only thing that worries me about this game in that case is the risk of injury on a field that is covered in ice, that has no heating coils in it.

      December 16, 2010 at 8:32 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s