DA BEARS, ALL DA TIME!

The Pro Bowl Rosters, from a Bears’ Point of View…

Let me begin by saying “THANK YOU” to the Vikings for shocking the Eagles in Philly to give us first-round bye. Don’t look now, but the Bears,  who play at Green Bay at 4:15 on Sunday, are going to be able to see if the Falcons and Saints both win before deciding how long to play our starters, if at all. More on that stuff tomorrow. But today, lets go over the Pro Bowl. Congratulations to Devin Hester, Julius Peppers, Brian Urlacher, and Lance Briggs for making the Pro Bowl—I don’t think anyone could call their placement on the Pro Bowl team unjustified. Hester has been the best returner in either league; Peppers and Urlacher could both make a case for Defensive Player of the Year; and Briggs has been his usual consistent self.

Now, I want to take a look at the full NFC roster and compare, by the numbers, how some Bears who weren’t named to the squad stack up numbers-wise with the guys who made the NFC Roster (Here’s hoping NO Bears play in the Pro Bowl, because they are getting ready for a game the following Sunday).

Jay Cutler, QB- I think Cutler, especially after last weeks game, has won as many of his detractors over as he possibly can without winning a playoff game. YET. Pro-Bowl-wise, it is hard to argue with who made the roster, especially when you consider there wasn’t even room for Aaron Rodgers on the roster. Matt Ryan will be there on the basis of being the QB of the team with the Best Record. Drew Brees won the Super Bowl last year and has had a good year; and Michael Vick is the feel-good story of the NFL this year. Cutler has had a good year; but it would be hard fro someone to argue his way onto the roster above those four guys.

Matt Forte, RB- Forte may have the best argument for being snubbed as his numbers compare pretty favorably with the three guys who made the team, Michael Turner (Falcons), Adrian Peterson (Vikings), and Stephen Jackson (Rams). On the surface, if you look at rushing yards ONLY, Forte with 978 yards seems not in the same league with those guys: Turner (1304), Peterson (1267), the Giants’ Ahmad Bradshaw (1213), S.Jackson (1196), and the Eagles’ Lesean McCoy (1080) are all well ahead of the Bears’ RB. However, if you take into account recieving yards as well as rushing yards, then Forte ranks ahead of Turner by a large margin (1465 to 1389).  Forte has more TDs (9) than Bradshaw (8) or Jackson (6); and averages more yards per carry (4.4) than Turner (4.1) or Jackson (3.7).

Olin Kreutz, C- I know there are no real NFL-kept stats to rate the performance of an offensive lineman, as opposed to other positions. However, the importance of Kreutz cannot be understated, as he is the ONLY player on our offensive line that is playing the same position they started the season in. He has held his own against the great DTs in our division. And I don’t know too much about the centers that were selected, except that Andre Gurode’s team (Cowboys) is 5 AND FREAKING 10; and Shaun O’Hara (Giants) has played in 6 OF 15 GAMES.

Chris Harris, S- I know. I am as surprised as you that I am putting his name up here. I was first in line for the “Trade for OJ Atogwe” Fan Club.  I was in the camp that wanted a Major Wright-Craig Steltz combo at safety.  Chris Harris is too slow at times and can be a liability in deep coverage. But he has really anchored the secondary, and has made some huge plays for us. Statisically, he is tied for the ead in INTs (5) and fumble recoveries (2) for all NFC safeties. For those of you who watch who follow the NFC closely, name me three safeties that have had better years than Chris Harris. Of the safeties chosen for the NFC, Nick Collins (Packers) has 3 INTS and 0 fumble recoveries; Antrel Rolle (Giants) has 1 INT and 1 fumble recovery; and Adrian Wilson (Cardinals) has 2 INTs and 0 fumble recoveries. Do I think Chris Harris is one of the best 3 safeties in the NFC? Probably not. But he has had the best year statistically of anyone out there.

Other players who have had good enough years to warrant consideration, especially if the stars back out at the rate they have the past few years are DE Israel Idonije, K Robbie Gould, and ST Corey Graham.

Advertisements

3 responses

  1. johnnyharvard

    Every year every team has a legitimate beef for their snubs. I don’t think theres any real blatant snubs on the Bears. There are a couple guys who rank statistically worthy, however as we know its more a lifetime achievement award &/or popularity contest. I’m just happy they don’t determine the starters solely on Fan voting like baseball which is a joke. I also think Briggs didn’t deserve to go. He’s been solid for the Bears this season but far from dominant. Not sure if thats because his role is downgraded because of the other guys stepping it up or not, but rarely could I say Briggs was a game changer this season. All pro is the one I really acknowledge as a legit indicator of who have bee the best in the league. I think Jays going to be there a few times though. specially if they keep the same offense and most the same coaches throughout his career. Lets not forget improving his weapong and O-line too. I think next year will be a pretty spectacular one for Jay and this offense.

    December 31, 2010 at 6:10 pm

  2. lincoln1

    Gould is money from 40 yards in, but Ackers is money too and really can make it from anywhere U want him to. Ackers is the best kicker in the league and you can not argue against him.

    As for Cutler, if Rodgers didn’t make it, then Cutler has no beef. Cutler needs to be much more consistent to be a pro bowler.

    December 31, 2010 at 9:32 am

    • yeah. the only 2 I really think that had an argument are Kreutz and Harris—and thats more because of who got in instead than anything else.

      December 31, 2010 at 9:35 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s